Is It Common To Get Hepatitis From A Dental Cleaning

Recommended Infection-Control Practices for Dentistry

Dental personnel may be exposed to a wide diversity of microorganisms in the claret and saliva of patients they treat in the dental operatory. These include Mycobacterium tuberculosis, hepatitis B virus, staphylococci, streptococci, cytomegalovirus, herpes simplex virus types I and Ii, human T- lymphotropic virus type III/lymphadenopathy-associated virus (HTLV-III/LAV), and a number of viruses that infect the upper respiratory tract. Infections may be transmitted in dental practise by blood or saliva through directly contact, droplets, or aerosols. Although not documented, indirect contact manual of infection past contaminated instruments is possible. Patients and dental health-care workers (DHCWs) accept the potential of transmitting infections to each other (1).

A mutual set of infection-control strategies should be effective for preventing hepatitis B, caused immunodeficiency syndrome, and other infectious diseases caused by bloodborne viruses (2-4). The ability of hepatitis B virus to survive in the environment (v) and the loftier titers of virus in blood (half dozen) make this virus a skillful model for infection-control practices to preclude transmission of a big number of other infectious agents by blood or saliva. Considering all infected patients cannot be identified by history, physical examination, or readily available laboratory tests (iii), the following recommendations should be used routinely in the care of all patients in dental practices.

MEDICAL HISTORY

Always obtain a thorough medical history. Include specific questions virtually medications, current illnesses, hepatitis, recurrent illnesses, unintentional weight loss, lymphadenopathy, oral soft tissue lesions, or other infections. Medical consultation may be indicated when a history of active infection or systemic disease is elicited.

USE OF PROTECTIVE ATTIRE AND Bulwark TECHNIQUES

1. For protection of personnel and patients, gloves must always be worn

when touching claret, saliva, or mucous membranes (7-10). Gloves must exist worn by DHCWs when touching blood-soiled items, torso fluids, or secretions, likewise every bit surfaces contaminated with them. Gloves must be worn when examining all oral lesions. All piece of work must be completed on 1 patient, where possible, and the easily must exist washed and regloved before performing procedures on some other patient. Repeated use of a single pair of gloves is non recommended, since such employ is likely to produce defects in the glove material, which will diminish its value equally an effective barrier.

2. Surgical masks and protective eyewear or chin-length plastic face up shields must be worn when splashing or spattering of claret or other body fluids is likely, equally is mutual in dentistry (xi,12).

3. Reusable or disposable gowns, laboratory coats, or uniforms must be worn when clothing is probable to be soiled with blood or other body fluids. If reusable gowns are worn, they may exist washed, using a normal laundry cycle. Gowns should be changed at least daily or when visibly soiled with blood (thirteen).

iv. Impervious-backed paper, aluminum foil, or articulate plastic wrap may be used to encompass surfaces (east.chiliad., light handles or 10-ray unit heads) that may be contaminated by blood or saliva and that are hard or impossible to disinfect. The coverings should be removed (while DHCWs are gloved), discarded, and then replaced (after ungloving) with clean material betwixt patients.

5. All procedures and manipulations of potentially infective materials should be performed advisedly to minimize the formation of aerosol, spatters, and aerosols, where possible. Utilise of rubber dams, where appropriate, high-speed evacuation, and proper patient positioning should facilitate this procedure.

HANDWASHING AND CARE OF Hands

Easily must ever be washed between patient handling contacts (following removal of gloves), after touching inanimate objects likely to exist contaminated by claret or saliva from other patients, and before leaving the operatory. The rationale for handwashing later gloves accept been worn is that gloves become perforated, knowingly or unknowingly, during utilise and allow bacteria to enter beneath the glove fabric and multiply rapidly. For many routine dental procedures, such every bit examinations and nonsurgical techniques, handwashing with plainly lather appears to be adequate, since soap and water will remove transient microorganisms acquired directly or indirectly from patient contact (13). For surgical procedures, an antimicrobial surgical handscrub should be used (14). Extraordinary care must be used to avert hand injuries during procedures. Still, when gloves are torn, cutting, or punctured, they must be removed immediately, hands thoroughly done, and regloving achieved before completion of the dental procedure. DHCWs who have exudative lesions or weeping dermatitis should refrain from all direct patient intendance and from handling dental patient-intendance equipment until the condition resolves (xv).

USE AND Intendance OF SHARP INSTRUMENTS AND NEEDLES

1. Precipitous items (needles, scalpel blades, and other abrupt instruments)

should be considered as potentially infective and must be handled with extraordinary intendance to prevent unintentional injuries.

2. Disposable syringes and needles, scalpel blades, and other sharp items must be placed into puncture-resistant containers located as shut as practical to the expanse in which they were used. To prevent needlestick injuries, disposable needles should non be recapped; purposefully bent or broken; removed from disposable syringes; or otherwise manipulated past hand after employ.

iii. Recapping of a needle increases the risk of unintentional needlestick injury. There is no evidence to suggest that reusable aspirating-type syringes used in dentistry should exist handled differently from other syringes. Needles of these devices should not be recapped, bent, or cleaved before disposal.

4. Considering certain dental procedures on an private patient may require multiple injections of anesthetic or other medications from a single syringe, information technology would exist more prudent to place the unsheathed needle into a "sterile field" between injections rather than to recap the needle between injections. A new (sterile) syringe and a fresh solution should be used for each patient.

INDICATIONS FOR High-LEVEL DISINFECTION OR STERILIZATION OF INSTRUMENTS

Surgical and other instruments that normally penetrate soft tissue and/or bone (e.g., forceps, scalpels, bone chisels, scalers, and surgical burs) should be sterilized after each utilise. Instruments that are not intended to penetrate oral soft tissues or bone (e.yard., amalgam condensers, plastic instruments, and burs) but that may come into contact with oral tissues should besides exist sterilized afterwards each use, if possible; nonetheless, if sterili- zation is not viable, the latter instruments should receive loftier-level disinfection (3,13,16).

METHODS FOR Loftier-LEVEL DISINFECTION OR STERILIZATION

Before high-level disinfection or sterilization, instruments should be cleaned to remove droppings. Cleaning may be achieved by a thorough scrubbing with soap and water or a detergent, or by using a mechanical device (east.grand., an ultrasonic cleaner). Persons involved in cleaning and decontam- inating instruments should clothing heavy-duty prophylactic gloves to prevent hand injuries. Metal and heat-stable dental instruments should be routinely sterilized between utilise by steam under pressure (autoclaving), dry rut, or chemical vapor. The adequacy of sterilization cycles should be verified past the periodic apply of spore-testing devices (eastward.m., weekly for nearly dental practices) (13). Heat- and steam-sensitive chemical indicators may be used on the outside of each pack to assure it has been exposed to a sterilizing bike. Rut-sensitive instruments may require up to x hours' exposure in a liquid chemical agent registered by the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) as a disinfectant/sterilant; this should exist followed by rinsing with sterile h2o. High-level disinfection may be accomplished by immersion in either boiling water for at least 10 minutes or an EPA-registered disinfec- tant/sterilant chemical for the exposure time recommended by the chemical's manufacturer.

DECONTAMINATION OF ENVIRONMENTAL SURFACES

At the completion of work activities, countertops and surfaces that may have go contaminated with blood or saliva should be wiped with absorbent toweling to remove inapplicable organic material, then disinfected with a suitable chemical germicide. A solution of sodium hypochlorite (household bleach) prepared fresh daily is an inexpensive and very effective germicide. Concentrations ranging from 5,000 ppm (a one:ten dilution of household bleach) to 500 ppm (a 1:100 dilution) sodium hypochlorite are effective, depending on the amount of organic material (east.1000., blood, mucus, etc.) present on the surface to be cleaned and disinfected. Caution should be exercised, since sodium hypochlorite is corrosive to metals, particularly aluminum.

DECONTAMINATION OF LABORATORY SUPPLIES AND MATERIALS

Claret and saliva should be thoroughly and carefully cleaned from laboratory supplies and materials that have been used in the oral fissure (east.g., impression materials, bite registration), especially before polishing and grinding intra-oral devices. Materials, impressions, and intra-oral appliances should be cleaned and disinfected earlier being handled, adjusted, or sent to a dental laboratory (17). These items should also be cleaned and disinfected when returned from the dental laboratory and earlier placement in the patient's oral cavity. Because of the ever-increasing variety of dental materials used intra-orally, DHCWs are advised to consult with manufacturers as to the stability of specific materials relative to disinfection procedures. A chemic germicide that is registered with the EPA as a "infirmary disinfectant" and that has a characterization merits for mycobactericidal (e.one thousand., tuberculocidal) activity is preferred, because mycobacteria correspond i of the most resistant groups of microorganisms; therefore, germicides that are effective against mycobacteria are also effective against other bacterial and viral pathogens (15). Advice betwixt a dental office and a dental laboratory with regard to handling and decontamination of supplies and materials is of the utmost importance.

USE AND CARE OF ULTRASONIC SCALERS, HANDPIECES, AND DENTAL UNITS

1. Routine sterilization of handpieces between patients is desirable;

however, not all handpieces can be sterilized. The nowadays physical config- urations of most handpieces do not readily lend them to high-level disin- fection of both external and internal surfaces (see 2 below); therefore, when using handpieces that cannot be sterilized, the following cleaning and disin- fection procedures should exist completed betwixt each patient: After use, the handpiece should be flushed (see ii below), and then thoroughly scrubbed with a detergent and h2o to remove adherent textile. It should and so be thoroughly wiped with absorbent textile saturated with a chemical germicide that is registered with the EPA every bit a "hospital disinfectant" and is mycobactericidal at apply-dilution (15). The disinfecting solution should remain in contact with the handpiece for a fourth dimension specified past the disinfectant's manufacturer. Ultrasonic scalers and air/h2o syringes should exist treated in a similar way between patients. Following disinfection, whatever chemic residue should be removed by rinsing with sterile h2o.

2. Because water retraction valves within the dental units may aspirate infective materials back into the handpiece and water line, check valves should be installed to reduce the risk of transfer of infective textile (eighteen). While the magnitude of this risk is not known, information technology is prudent for water- cooled handpieces to be run and to discharge water into a sink or container for 20-xxx seconds after completing care on each patient. This is intended to physically affluent out patient fabric that may have been aspirated into the handpiece or water line. Additionally, there is some bear witness that overnight bacterial accumulation tin exist significantly reduced by allowing water-cooled handpieces to run and to discharge water into a sink or container for several minutes at the starting time of the clinic day (19). Sterile saline or sterile h2o should be used equally a coolant/irrigator when performing surgical procedures involving the cut of soft tissue or bone.

HANDLING OF BIOPSY SPECIMENS

In general, each specimen should he put in a sturdy container with a secure lid to prevent leaking during send. Intendance should be taken when collecting specimens to avoid contamination of the outside of the container. If the outside of the container is visibly contaminated, it should be cleaned and disinfected, or placed in an impervious bag (20).

DISPOSAL OF Waste matter MATERIALS

All sharp items (particularly needles), tissues, or blood should exist considered potentially infective and should be handled and disposed of with special precautions. Disposable needles, scalpels, or other sharp items should be placed intact into puncture-resistant containers before disposal. Blood, suctioned fluids, or other liquid waste product may be carefully poured into a drain continued to a sanitary sewer system. Other solid waste contaminated with claret or other body fluids should exist placed in sealed, sturdy impervious numberless to prevent leakage of the contained items. Such contained solid wastes tin and so be disposed of according to requirements established by local or country environmental regulatory agencies and published recommendations (thirteen,xx).

Developed by Dental Disease Prevention Action, Heart for Prevention Svcs, Hospital Infections Program, Center for Infectious Diseases, CDC.

Editorial Note

Editorial Annotation: All DHCWs must be made aware of sources and methods of transmission of infectious diseases. The above recommendations for infection command in dental practices incorporate procedures that should be effective in preventing the manual of infectious agents from dental patients to DHCWs and vice versa. Assessment of quantifiable risks to dental personnel and patients for specific diseases requires further research. There is no current documentation of patient-to-patient blood- or saliva-borne disease transmission from procedures performed in dental exercise. While few in number, reported outbreaks of dentist-to-patient transmission of hepatitis B take resulted in serious and even fatal consequences (9). Herpes simplex virus has been transmitted to over 20 patients from the fingers of a DHCW (10). Serologic markers for hepatitis B in dentists have increased dramatically in the United states over the past several years, which suggests electric current infection-control practices have been insufficient to prevent the manual of this infectious agent in the dental operatory. While vaccination for hepatitis B is strongly recommended for dental personnel (21), vaccination solitary is not crusade for relaxation of strict adherence to accustomed methods of asepsis, disinfection, and sterilization.

Various infection-command guidelines exist for hospitals and other clinical settings. Dental facilities located in hospitals and other institutional settings have generally utilized existing guidelines for institutional do. These recommendations are offered every bit guidance to DHCWs in noninstitutional settings for enhancing infection-control practices in dentistry; they may be useful in institutional settings too.

References

1. Ahtone J, Goodman RA. Hepatitis B and dental personnel: transmission to patients and prevention issues. J Am Dent Assoc 1983;106:219-22.

2. Crawford JJ. Country-of-the-fine art practical infection command in dentistry. J Am Paring Assoc 1985;110:629-33.

3. Cottone JA, Mitchell EW, Bakery CH, et al. Proceedings of the National Symposium on Hepatitis B and the Dental Profession. J Am Paring Assoc 1985;110:614-49.

4. CDC. Acquired immunodeficiency syndrome (AIDS): precautions for health- care workers and allied professionals. MMWR 1983;32:450-ane.

5. Bond WW, Favero MS, Petersen NJ, Gravelle CR, Ebert JW, Maynard JE. Survival of hepatitis B virus afterward drying and storage for one week {Letter}. Lancet 1981;I:550-1.

6. Shikata T, Karasawa T, Abe K, et al. Hepatitis B e antigen and infectivity of hepatitis B virus. J Infect Dis 1977;136:571-six.

7. Hadler SC, Sorley DL, Acree KH, et al. An outbreak of hepatitis B in a dental practice. Ann Intern Med 1981;95:133-viii.

8. Occupational Safety and Health Administration. Adventure of hepatitis B infection for workers in the health care delivery system and suggested methods for risk reduction. U.S. Department of Labor 1983;(CPL two-two.36).

9. CDC. Hepatitis B among dental patients -- Indiana. MMWR 1985;34:73-5.

10. Manzella JP, McConville JH, Valenti W, Menegus MA, Swierkosz EM, Arens Yard. An outbreak of herpes simplex virus type ane gingivostomatitis in a dental hygiene practice. JAMA 1984;252:2019-22.

11. Petersen NJ, Bail WW, Favero MS. Air sampling for hepatitis B surface antigen in a dental operatory. J Am Paring Assoc 1979;99:465-7.

12. Bond WW, Petersen NJ, Favero MS, Ebert JW, Maynard JE. Transmission of blazon B vital hepatitis B via middle inoculation of a chimpanzee. J Clin Microbiol 1982;15:533-4.

13. Garner JS, Favero MS. Guideline for handwashing and infirmary environ- mental command, 1985. Atlanta, Georgia: Centers for Disease Control, 1985; publication no. 99-1117.

14. Garner JS. Guideline for prevention of surgical wound infections, 1985. Atlanta, Georgia: Centers for Disease Control, 1985; publication no. 99-2381.

15. CDC. Recommendations for preventing manual of infection with homo T-lymphotropic virus blazon Iii/lymphadenopathy-associated virus in the workplace. MMWR 1985;34:682-6, 691-5.

16. Favero MS. Sterilization, disinfection, and antisepsis in the hospital. In: Lennette EH, Balows A, Hauslen WJ, Shadomy HJ. Transmission of clinical microbiology. Washington, D.C.: American Society of Microbiology, 1985:129-37.

17. Council on Dental Therapeutics and Council on Prosthetic Services and Dental Laboratory Relations, American Dental Association. Guidelines for infection command in the dental role and the commercial laboratory. J Am Dent Assoc 1985;110:969-72.

18. Bagga BSR, Irish potato RA, Anderson AW, Punwani I. Contamination of dental unit cooling h2o with oral microorganisms and its prevention. J Am Paring Assoc 1984;109:712-vi.

19. Scheid RC, Kim CK, Vivid JS, Whitely MS, Rosen S. Reduction of microbes in handpieces past flushing before use. J Am Dent Assoc 1982;105:658-60.

20. Garner JS, Simmons BP. CDC guideline for isolation precautions in hospitals. Atlanta, Georgia: Centers for Disease Control. 1983; HHS publication no. (CDC) 83-8314.

21. ACIP. Inactivated hepatitis B virus vaccine. MMWR 1982;31:317-22, 327-8.

Disclaimer All MMWR HTML documents published before Jan 1993 are electronic conversions from ASCII text into HTML. This conversion may take resulted in graphic symbol translation or format errors in the HTML version. Users should not rely on this HTML certificate, but are referred to the original MMWR paper re-create for the official text, figures, and tables. An original paper copy of this upshot can exist obtained from the Superintendent of Documents, U.South. Government Printing Part (GPO), Washington, DC 20402-9371; telephone: (202) 512-1800. Contact GPO for current prices.

**Questions or messages regarding errors in formatting should exist addressed to mmwrq@cdc.gov.

Folio converted: 08/05/98

This page last reviewed v/2/01

Source: https://www.cdc.gov/mmwr/preview/mmwrhtml/00033634.htm

Posted by: montgomeryoffinto49.blogspot.com

Share this post